Search for: "DOES 1-6"
Results 381 - 400
of 39,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
Does 1-37, CV 11-3995 (E.D.N.Y.) [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
The Rules governing procedure in the Division of Workers’ Compensation are listed at N.J.A.C.12:235 - 1:1 through 13:6. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 1:05 pm
Your coverage and your renewal, if applicable, will continue."6 words. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
1. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:35 pm
For instance, California does not allow a citizen to openly carry a loaded firearm in public (http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/4/2/1/2/s12031)! [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:08 am
Pride Solutions, LLC et al, 1-13-cv-03418 (ILND November 28, 2016, Order) (Pallmeyer, USDJ) [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 pm
States with cases included Arizona (1), Iowa (6), Kansas (6), Missouri (9), Nebraska (26), New Hampshire (1), Oklahoma (1) and South Dakota (13). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:49 pm
Based on various examples of copolymer-1 disclosed in the references cited in the specification, the court determined that an accused product meets the “approximately 6:2:5:1” limitation as long as its amino acid composition does not vary from the “ideal” percentages by an aggregate of more than 12%. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
Said weekend possession shall begin at 6:00 p.m. on Friday and end at 6:00 p.m. on the following Sunday during the 30 days of extended summer possession selected by the non-primary parent. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:49 am
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the agency tasked with enforcing COPPA,[3] announced a whopping $170 million settlement with YouTube in September 2019,[4] with a message that focused more on bragging about the unprecedented size of the financial sum than any tangible benefit the settlement would provide for the well-being of children on the internet.[5] The settlement marks a shift in COPPA enforcement in which the FTC will begin targeting website users rather than the… [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Jan. 6, 2023)Delaware law allows for two exceptions to the continuous stock ownership rule for stockholders to bring and maintain standing to assert derivative claims that predate a transaction: (1) when the transaction, which would otherwise deprive the plaintiffs of standing, is essentially a reorganization that does not affect the plaintiff’s relative ownership in the post-merger enterprise; or (2) when a plaintiff stockholder loses standing based on a merger… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Biden, (Docket No. 22-816, certiorari denied, 6/20/2023). [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:42 am
., Nov. 6, 2013), the Minnesota Supreme Court, in a 4-1 decision, upheld the state's clergy-sexual-conduct statute against both facial and an as-applied Establishment Clause challenges. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New… [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:30 am
In fact, the seller remained in the home for 6-7 weeks. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 1:34 pm
Examples abound, with two in a row last week, here (pp. 5-6) and here (p. 3, fn.1).Also of note from last week, this 9th Cir. opinion here about anti-SLAPP appealability.And see The Great Reshaping: How Trump is Changing the Game on Judicial Nominations: With 148 judicial vacancies as of Jan. 2 and an increasingly aging federal bench, President Donald Trump could remake the federal judiciary on a scale that hasn’t been possible in decades. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:19 am
Perhaps, the Department does not want to interfere with the 1/6 Committee and believes time is on its side. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:15 am
The issues I will be watching in 2018 other than Oil States are as follows: (1) What does the new Director of the USPTO do with respect to reforming the PTAB? [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:03 am
The key line:Because this case does not involvefactual findings to which we owe deference under Teva, we again reverse the district court’s constructions of the disputed claim terms and subsequent findings of infringement, and remand for further proceedingslink: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1409.Opinion.6-1-2015.1.PDFNote Feb. 2015 IPBiz post CAFC mentions Teva v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), apply to an employee who is terminated by a non-U.S. corporation that does business in (and is regulated by) the United States. [read post]
