Search for: "DON S. CRAIG " Results 381 - 400 of 1,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 9:00 pm by Doug Austin
  Thankfully, you don’t have to do that – you can attend a one hour webcast later this month for a recap of recent key eDiscovery trends and case law to stay current with today’s trends in eDiscovery, information governance and cybersecurity. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:56 am by Michael Lowe
But don’t take this criminal defense lawyer’s synopsis of the government’s stance. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Their argument is the same as newspapers complaining about online competition from Craig's List for their classified ads. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm
Domestic workers, he says, simply don’t appear to be willing to do this work. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Craig, Relying on (User) Rights-Talk: On Copyright Limits and Rhetorical Risks Many ways to limit ©; here focusing on defenses/exceptions, the ideal type of which is fair use. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 8:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
First up was David Martin's piece on the new warship, the USS Zumwalt. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:19 pm by Jim Calloway
Craig also notes that the recordings might be beneficial to the Echo user as well in case one’s tech savvy friends add “buy heroin” to your shopping list and you accidently email it to local law enforcement. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 12:01 pm by admin
 Last month, Sara, Craig and I visited collaborators at 18F (the Federal team dedicated to improving government websites), the National Archives (our collaborators on the Oyez project), the Justice Department, and the House of Representatives, and some of you,  as well as with friends and helpers among the Cornell Law School’s many alumni who work in the city. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:01 am by Cathy Moran
 That may be Craigs List;  e Bay; Auto Trader or like marketplaces. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The Charlotte Observer has an editorial this week that says that political ads “funded by shadowy independent groups who don’t disclose their donors” are “undercutting the judiciary’s credibility and giving voters the impression that judges and justices are for sale. [read post]