Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Under the circumstances, the intentional acts exclusion does not apply (see Slayko v Security Mut. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
Many insurers, to avoid argument, now add wording to their policies that establishes that the insurer does not intend to, nor will it, pay for diminution of value. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
King v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
In Wheaton College v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Characterizing a complaint as a violation of civil service rules does not avoid having to seek relief pursuant to the contract grievance procedureMontgomery County Deputy Sheriff's Assn., Inc. v County of Montgomery, 2008 NY Slip Op 09519, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCathy Anderson and Grace De Waal Malefyt each worked for a period of time in the title of "part-time" correction officer in Montgomery County. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 2:09 pm
The Fourth Department confronted this issue in People v White (2009 NY Slip Op 03290 4th Dept 4/24/09).Identification testimony is powerful evidence of guilt. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Jeanne Kornowicz, a school psychologist in the Cheektowaga Central School District in Erie County, applied to her employer to add her spouse, Joy Higgins, to her insurance coverage after the New York Appellate Division, 4th Department, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
., LTD v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:36 pm
See, Standard Fire Insurance Policy: Appraisal, New York State Insurance Department Office General Counsel, Opinion No. 01-03-05. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:11 pm
Reyes, No. 115401 -- Issue Presented: Is a clause of an automobile insurance policy excluding all liability coverage for the sole named insured and titleholder on the insured vehicle void as against public policy? [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:27 pm
So, if you do not have dental insurance in your current court order that’s also a basis to file a modification. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
The style of the case is Oleksy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:11 am
The complaint alleges that the commercial lending operations were essentially unsupervised, even though the commercial lending department “recklessly” pursued “explosive commercial loan growth. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:55 pm
The Court held that carriers were bound by representations that the industry had made to the New Jersey Department of Insurance about the narrow meaning of the exclusion. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
In dissent, Chief Judge Fearing argued the department had opened the email system to religious messages by forwarding newsletters from its health insurer about solving personal problems and living a healthy lifestyle, because the government may not “prefer secular chatter over religious oration” (Sprague v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:03 pm
Therefore the remaining mandate is a “command to buy insurance”, which the Supreme Court held the Federal Government does not have the power to do. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am
Pear recounts, for example, that a staffer for Republican Senator Michael Enzi of Wyoming, a senior member of both Senate committees responsible for the ACA, does not accept the King v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company will never get the press scrutiny of King v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
Automobile Insurance Company, 183 N.Y.S. 690, at 691, a case from Monroe County in 1920 that was affirmed by the Fourth Department; Accord Indian Chef v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
US Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
