Search for: "District of Columbia v. Smith"
Results 381 - 400
of 453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
Finally, as long as I'm here on a limited brief I'm going to use the opportunity to link up my observations on the art of the elevator speech and the oral arguments in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm
At least 26 states and the District of Columbia have some kind of law prohibiting the tracking of others without their knowledge. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Office for Harmonisation in… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation: the D.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
Four state legislatures, plus the District of Columbia, and one state court have successfully taken the step, with more likely to follow. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
Hounshell, From the American System to Mass Production, 1800-1932 (1985); Merritt Roe Smith, Harpers Ferry Armory and the New Technology: The Challenge of Change (1977); Felicia Johnson Deyrup, Arms Makers of the Connecticut Valley: A Regional Study of the Economic Development of the Small Arms Industry, 1798-1870 (1948). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Paul Smith writes at his blog:"[T]he Supreme Court ruled in Morse v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
A municipality sought a similar tort-based tax in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
And, above all, we will be watching to see if Special Counsel Smith brings Jan. 6-related cases against non-rioters, including the former President. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Amicus brief of Columbia Legal Services et al. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Connecticut) “How to Manipulate the Rule of Law” (examining Justice Antonin Scalia’s Second Amendment jurisprudence in District of Columbia v. [read post]
