Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 381 - 400
of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 6:17 am
It appears that Patrick Mahomes does not have a trademark registration for his name. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
., Oppositions Nos. 91158891 and 91158941 (March 23, 2007) [precedential], it ruled that Opposer B&D had established a family of "HOG" marks for power-operated outdoor equipment. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
, Case Nos. 05 C 5844, 07 C 2439, 2007 WL 4105204 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Patent Nos. 9,278,096 (the “’096 patent”) and 9,125,910 (the “’910 patent”). [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:06 am
Patent Nos. 5,764,034 (the ‘034 Patent), 5,782,805 (the ‘805 Patent), and 6,231,560 (the ‘560 Patent). [read post]
Judge Stark denies motion to supplement expert reports, grants summary judgment of non-infringement.
29 Mar 2012, 10:31 am
Nos. 04-1436-LPS, 06-404-LPS, 08-371-LPS (D. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
I, § 13, does not save his argument. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
Question: Does the Fourth Circuit's ruling on the recovery permissible under section 502(a)(3) need to be thought through again under the Supreme Court's ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
., Nos. 10-20202, c/w 10-20371, (5th Cir. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of clear communication during performance and that the Christian doctrine may be considered on a case-by-case basis when evaluating the applicability of clauses that the contract does not expressly incorporate. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 5:57 pm
Nos falamos Portugues! [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:41 am
Blizzard Entertainment, Nos. 09-15932 & 16044 (9th Cir. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Gelita USA, Inc., Civil File Nos. 09-3479/10-1647 (8th Cir. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm
So with over 600 thousand solo and small firms in the U.S. today, what does it take to stand out among the crowd? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
., Nos. 2022-1751, 2022-1813 (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The DMCA provides that if the copyright owner does not file a lawsuit within 14 days, the ISP is required to restore the content. [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Case Nos. 12-6270/13-5050) (PDF). [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Case Nos. 12-6270/13-5050) (PDF). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
Supp. 33, 37 (D.D.C. 1988), where the district court stated that “the reexamination statute does not contemplate a ‘reex- amination’ of the sufficiency of a disclosure. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 7:27 am
I particularly appreciated the subtext: that the reason that things remain unchanged for the last 40 years or so is because it is in the interests of the major players (and their intellectual servants) to ensure that everyone is committed to change but that change does not occur. [read post]
