Search for: "Doe v. Choices, Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 3,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 6:53 am by Nedim Malovic
However, in light of the seminal US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist), works that combine geometric shapes, letters, and other non-protectable elements into a larger design may be registered if the overall design is sufficiently creative. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 8:44 pm by Mark Murakami
Suwannee River SPA Lines, Inc., 866 F.2d 752, 771 (5th Cir. 1989) (quoting Boudoin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm by Priscilla Smith
Benson, 285 U.S. 22, 60 (1932)); see also Planned Parenthood Ariz., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:31 am by Jani
Whether a tweet would count as a "short phrase" and therefore is not protected would remain an assessment of its creativity (as was discussed in Arica Institute Inc v Palmer, for example), as if the phrase exhibits a minimal amount of creativity, it would arguably be protected by copyright in the US.As can be seen Twitter and tweets do pose a challenge to copyright and whether its protection extends to them within the common law. [read post]