Search for: "Does 1 Through 35" Results 381 - 400 of 4,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
Under Federal Law in the Controlled Substances Act, marijuana and derivatives including CBD oil are Schedule 1 substances illegal to transport or possess, along with heroin. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
This is not a description of the "method for transmitting data in a telecommunications network and switch for implementing said method" (page 4 of the opinion below) that is the subject matter of the patent dispute, but it is the petitioner's suggested process for reasoning through patent disputes. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:25 am by Jeff Marshall
But a decision to back away from the cliff by extending the current favorable tax rates will be expensive:  The increase in the federal estate tax from 35% over $5 million to 55% over $1 million would save an estimated $35 billion in 2013 and $430 billion between 2013 and 2022. [read post]
In a unanimous decision late last month, a three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit vacated approval of a $35 million settlement between GoDaddy and a nationwide class of consumers who received automated GoDaddy marketing calls between 2014 through 2016. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
In an appeal of a 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:58 am by admin
While Spaniards marched through central Madrid and Greeks torched Athens, Ireland has been relatively calm. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
REV. 709, 710 (2012)Reference 107 is to 320 U.S. 1; 63 S. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by admin
    The mismatch between home-seekers and vacant houses is due to a complex set of reasons, including:   1. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A 53(c), second sentence, explicitly states that the exclusion provision does not apply to products for use in such methods. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  The Federal Circuit does not review this evidence of concrete plans. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Grounds 1 and 2 were obviousness challenges with overlapping prior art citations: Ground 1 (Reed and Nishida) and Ground 2 (Castello, Fujiwara, and Nishida). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 12:07 pm by Scott Brinkman
A further explanation is provided below: Let’s say you have been charged with possession of marijuana (less than 35 grams). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:20 am by Evan Lim
Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) found that the evidence demonstrated that the claimed inventions were (1) conceived no later than August 2005, and (2) either (a) actually reduced to practice for their intended purpose in April and July 2005, or (b) diligently worked on toward constructive reduction to practice through May 3, 2006, thus finding that the ’355 patent does not qualify as prior art to the challenged… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Van der Peet made it clear at para 65 that determining a distinctive culture under s. 35(1) does not require an unbroken chain of continuity, they also suggested at para 19 that Aboriginal rights enshrined in the Charter are held by aboriginal members of Canadian society. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:53 pm
In the end, the constitutionality argument is strained, and the proper course would have been to pursue an invalidity argument (under 35 USC 101 or whatever) through the normal channels. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Thomas John
While this interaction is now subject to increased academic scrutiny, the same does not seem to be the case in practice. [read post]