Search for: "Duke v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:05 am
1975 Duke L.J. 188.Cohen, Mark C., United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:37 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Last week, in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:20 am
Even more guidance can be found in the Goodson Law Library's collection of legislative drafting resources, which can be searched in the Duke Libraries Catalog with the subject heading "Bill drafting – United States". [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
United States, the other case to be argued this morning, and lays out the conflict implicit in Pepper: between utilitarian and retributivist approaches to sentencing. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:47 am
As Dennis Crouch has recently noted, the reach of SAS may soon be tested in United Therapeutics Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:48 am
Dukes. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 11:16 pm
See Dukes v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
Dukes, 564 U.S. ___ (2011). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Like Chief Justice Roberts during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Under United States v. [read post]
