Search for: "ELLIS v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Michael William McConnell of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing on behalf of plaintiffs-appellees Bard and Goldfarb, won an affirmance of a District of Arizona finding of willfulnessin patent infringement. [ BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
Ellis also reviewed new media protocols for dealing with acts of terrorism in New Zealand. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:28 pm
Where testator dies seized of real property in several states the courts of each state may construe the will as to the realty situated in its own state (Matter of Good's Will, 304 N.Y. 110, 116, 106 N.E.2d 36, 39, supra; In re Ellis' Estate, Sur., 139 N.Y.S.2d 640; De Vaughn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:28 am
Following a December 2006 hearing in which experts weighed in with conflicting opinions, state District Court Judge Mark Kent Ellis rejected some of the methods used by Dr. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
In Marilyn Ellis v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, the plaintiff Marilyn Ellis with her California disability attorney contended that she was at all times a participant to a group long term disability plan with the policy number 63311 that was provided by the Sun Life Assurance Company (Sun Life). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
”  [By the way, the Bexis drug and medical device desk book lists a couple of other cases that have rejected plaintiff-side attempts to use preemption to undermine the learned intermediary rule:  Ellis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]