Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 2:08 pm
At FindLaw, Edward Lazarus has this essay discussing the role of the justices in the context of the Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm
Congratulations to Edward G. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Hu, Asenqua, Inc., Asenqua Capital Management, LLC, AQC Asset Management, Ltd., and Fireside Capital Management, Ltd.Case number: 09-cv-1177 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: March 18, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 26, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-48 SEC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 4:39 pm
(SeeMorris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
Still working through the various SCOTUS developments and a case from California. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
Aug. 3, 2010); Edwards v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:17 pm
In Khan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
NSA in 2008, and our original case, Hepting v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:55 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:57 pm
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California apparently got the same impression, which is why he set a TRO hearing (to be conducted via Zoom) for Monday, August 24:"CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING FOR [17] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Hearing re: [17] MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof set for… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:59 am
On March 18, 2015, in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:27 am
Amazon Did California Unintentionally (?) [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
Edwards, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:51 am
A client's "self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests [a]re insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated" (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]) The part of defendants' malpractice counterclaim that dealt with the action against Edward Roski III was properly dismissed. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:07 pm
Currently, Edwards v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:22 am
Edward A. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court, however, found that whatever anomaly might exist, it was consistent with IGRA’s history and design.[15] IGRA was enacted, the Court noted, after the Court’s decision in California v. [read post]
