Search for: "Fields v. Benefits Review Board*" Results 381 - 400 of 537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Virginia – used the power of judicial review to raise the professional standards of American public administrators in the fields of education, law enforcement, electoral administration, and family law. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, “student journalists increasingly arm themselves with mobile phones for multimedia newsgathering in the field. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
They can therefore help companies anticipate concerns that the agencies may raise during the HSR review process. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper will present a keynote address followed by a moderated discussion with experts in the field. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Given Selikoff’s reputation and prestige in the field of asbestos health effects, and his role in helping pass the Williams-Steiger Act of 1969, we might wonder why no one has written a full-length biography. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
Indeed the Featured Artists Coalition and the globally-focused International Artists Organisation have issued an urgent call to the European Parliament demanding That the Parliament ensures that performer rights be included in the European Union's current review of copyright law. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:55 am by Eric Goldman
We’ve had these transparency reports for over a year–is there any field data showing any benefit from the existing obligations? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:29 am by Schachtman
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In an oft-used metaphor, Congress supposedly intended to create a level playing field for takeover contests. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” However, he explained, to interpret the term “increased risk” in the statute, courts should rely on “the relevant medical field. [read post]