Search for: "Finger v. Finger," Results 381 - 400 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Editor's Note: John Mark Zeberkiewicz is a Director and Brigitte Fresco is Counsel at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In both the claimed invention and in Morris, the lighter is operated via sequential action of the finger and thumb; a mere reversal in the order of these actions does not confer patentability. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
"Kit Kat" finger shape marks: this time in Singapore The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
"Kit Kat" finger shape marks: this time in Singapore The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:40 am by Eric Goldman
ICAN claimed that the social media services took these actions due to government pressure and jawboning, especially pointing the finger at Rep. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:14 pm
In Castillo v 711 Group, Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 01255, the Third-Party Appellant apparently believed that although Workers' Compensation Law § 11 expressly defined "grave injury" as including the loss... [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am by Eric Goldman
Marc Jacobs Copyright Office Won’t Register ‘Middle-Finger Pictogram’ As Literary Work–Ashton v. [read post]