Search for: "Frank v. Securities" Results 381 - 400 of 1,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
In 2010, Dodd-Frank imposed a number of new requirements on municipal market participants, most of which are not important here. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Preston Lim
Canada’s Attorney General Blocks Disclosure of Evidence in National Security Case Last month, Canadian Attorney General David Lametti issued a security certificate in the ongoing case of R. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Not to be outdone, I spent most of that day writing a musical (and I'd like to think, poetic) version of Pinter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Southern District of New York, defendants have introduced two new ways to rebut Basic Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by James Hamilton
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:55 pm by James Hamilton
Senator Jack Reed has vowed to continue to try in future legislation to correct the investor protection problem associated with the US Supreme Court ruling in Gustafson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:35 am by Astarita
Somers, which interpreted the Dodd-Frank securities fraud law as only protecting whistleblowing to disclosures to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), not disclosures to the responsible officials in the whistleblower’s company. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
Faced with Washington’s repeated vetoes of UN Security Council resolutions calling for (in October) a humanitarian pause and (in December) a ceasefire, South Africa v Israel built on previous efforts to evade (Russian and/or Chinese) vetoes of Security Council action concerning mass atrocities in Myanmar, Syria and Ukraine. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:10 am by Karen Gullo
   “We need clarity from the Supreme Court to protect essential computer security research,” said Naomi Gilens, the Frank Stanton Legal Fellow at EFF. [read post]