Search for: "GEORGIA-PACIFIC" Results 381 - 400 of 897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 8:18 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
” Liu, a son of Taiwanese immigrants, was born in Georgia and grew up in Sacramento. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Friday’s Five: California employers get some PAGA relief – California attorney Anthony Zaller of Van Vleck Turner & Zaller on their California Employment Law Report No Copyright Protection for Hot Yoga Sequence – Seattle intellectual property lawyer Tonya Gisselberg on her blog, Seattle Copyright Watch The Trans-Pacific Partnership Calls for Eliminating Tariffs on “Environmentally Beneficial Products and Technologies” – A Win for the… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by James Yang
The seminal case in determining the reasonable royalty rate is Georgia-Pacific Corp. v U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:29 am by Steven M. Taber
   SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection  Agency (‘‘EPA’’) is proposing to enter into an administrative settlement agreement (‘‘Settlement Agreement’’)  with Georgia- Pacific Consumer Products, LP and International Paper Company (collectively ‘‘Settling Parties’’)  pursuant to Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:29 am by Steven M. Taber
   SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection  Agency (‘‘EPA’’) is proposing to enter into an administrative settlement agreement (‘‘Settlement Agreement’’)  with Georgia- Pacific Consumer Products, LP and International Paper Company (collectively ‘‘Settling Parties’’)  pursuant to Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:50 am
A Dade County jury in Florida has awarded Charles Garrison, a victim of mesothelioma $21 million after they determined he was exposed to dangerous asbestos while working at a Georgia Pacific compound. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm by Robert Vrana
The excluded testimony included: (1) A speculative opinion on Georgia Pacific factor 13 that was not based on an analysis of the portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or significant features or improvements added by the infringer, id.; (2) A damages opinion that relied on a third party patent without making a substantive comparison of that patent with the… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:23 am
Here, the court found the reasonable royalty to be $2.00 per unit by applying the Georgia Pacific and creating a 'hypothetical negotiation. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 3:52 am
 There is an in-depth discussion of the Georgia-Pacific factors and some handy flow charts. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 8:18 am
Adeboye Hall (L.L) Silver Spring, MD 20910 Contact: 240-271-0148 FIRN 5999 Harpers Farm Road, E-200 Columbia, MD 21044 Contact: Roselyn:410-992-1923 $20 Fee collected by FIRN Carlos Rosario International (Sponsored by Carlos Rosario and CARECEN) 1100 Harvard Street, NW, Washington, DC 20009 Pre- Registration Required *$25 Fee will be collected for completed applications *Free to Carlos Rosario Students with valid ID Contact: Rachel @ 202-328-9799 ext. 23 Ethiopian Community Center (Sponsored… [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:00 am
  The Federal Circuit tempered this holding by citing to Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 7:22 pm
It will be held Friday August 21, 2020 as a virtual event from 9.00 am through 4.00 pm (Pacific Time). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:46 am by Katherine Pompilio
  Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:00 p.m.: The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity will hold a hearing on the assault of freedom of expression in Asia. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:42 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apr. 25, 2013)As to parrots:Indeed, courts often parrot all 15factors to the jury, even if some of those factorsclearly are not relevant to the caseat hand. (...)In sum, we hold that, in all cases,a district court must instruct the juryonly on factors that are relevantto the specific case at issue.There is no Georgia-Pacific-likelist of factors that district courts can parrot for everycase involving RAND-encumbered patents. [read post]