Search for: "Garner v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 10:54 am by Bernadette Meyler
For example, the justices split quite vocally over this question in Ramos v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
As I mentioned on Monte Belmonte's show on the River, although federal law governs the taking itself, state law determines the meaning of "just compensation." [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 pm
As the Court of Appeals has written, "[b]ecause CPL 380.20 and 380.40 collectively provide that only a judge may impose a [postrelease supervision] sentence, we conclude that DOCS may not do so" (Matter of Garner v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., ___ NY3d ___, ___ [Apr. 29, 2008]). [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
” Andrew Pincus, who represented the petitioner in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
Citizens United - Supreme Court - United States - Government - Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
We've had a chance now to read - no, make that "study" - the Wyeth v. [read post]