Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation"
Results 381 - 400
of 864
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2015, 5:10 pm
Sterling, 822 S.W.2d 1, 10 (Tex. 1991), modified on other grounds by Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
Zoll Lifecor Corporation v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:36 am
General Motors, LLC, February 10, 2015, Springmann, T.). [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
The Board of Appeal was also right in simply clarifying that, in Audi v OHIM the distinctiveness of Audi’s slogan mark had been affirmed, given that the sign was a widely known slogan, having been used for many years, and could also lead consumers to identify the commercial origin of the advertised motor vehicles. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:37 am
Heco v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Westport Insurance Corporation, 751 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm
Mraz v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:54 pm
(AP Photo/Honda Motor Co. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
In Holler v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:11 pm
-market vehicles sold by Toyota, Honda, Mazda, BMW, Nissan and General Motors to the recall list for housing faulty Takata airbags. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Eleven major automobile manufacturers have issued recalls on more than 7.8 million cars equipped with defective airbags manufactured by Takata Corporation. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:39 am
The trial court had a nice quote that plaintiffs’ argument that the “from line” had to identify an actual person: is akin to complaining that an email from ‘Buick’ is falsely labeled because . . . the sender should read ‘General Motors Corporation’. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:38 am
In the case of Curtis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
Nor is there proof that the Department of Motor Vehicles would not have allowed the Buyer to register the vehicle had the correct information been placed on the form. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The corporation was owned by Defendant Lorraine Lago and her husband. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am
Five years after Kemp, in a case called Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales, Inc., the same court rejected a minority shareholder’s contention that his status as such exempted him from the at-will employment doctrine and allowed him to seek a remedy for wrongful termination of his employment. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Statements on matters of purely private concern do not fall within a generally unpr [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
Despite the widespread involvement of its legal staff, General Motors successfully invoked the privilege to help keep silent on the ignition scandal it eventually faced. [read post]
