Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 381 - 400 of 946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
’” The editorial board of Bloomberg joins a growing chorus calling for the Court to allow cameras to film oral arguments. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:00 am
Crown 90,000 170,000 0 260,000 James Dimon 0 0 0 0 Ellen V. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
  Upon release, the Texas Board of Parole imposed various “sex offender” conditions on Jennings based in part on an unrelated sex offense he committed over three decades earlier. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
At Newsweek, Pema Levy suggests that the Court’s decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Kiran Bhat
As Conor noted yesterday, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am by Peter Mahler
Retirement Plan for General Employees v McGraw-Hill Cos., 120 AD3d 1052, 2014 NY Slip Op 06154 [1st Dept Sept. 11, 2014], in which the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the trial court’s ruling dismissing a books-and-records proceeding brought against McGraw-Hill, and held that the petitioning pension fund’s stated purpose of the requested inspection, to investigate the board’s oversight of McGraw-Hill’s… [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
Clark, here; patent-venue case TC Heartland LLP v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
TuiteDocket: 11-1094Issue(s): Whether a federal court may grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner without determining that the state court’s “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” ruling was objectively unreasonable.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below [Yates v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
Retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor spoke at Pomona College yesterday on education and the courts. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
Railroad Retirement Board (Nov. 2): Whether, under federal laws governing benefits for railroad workers, the Railroad Retirement Board’s denial of a request to reopen an earlier benefits determination is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]