Search for: "HALL v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 4,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2022, 1:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
Available here: https://www.nycom.org/images/Open_Meetings_Law_2022_Amendments_-_New_Videoconference_Procedures.pdf OverviewAs part of the 2022 Enacted State Budget,1 the NY Legislature amended the NYS Open Meetings Law to provide when and how public bodies may conduct meetings via videoconference technology. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm by mdkeenan
Hall, which involved obstructing a peace officer. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Hall v Hobbick, 192 AD3d 776, 777). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, to the extent the plaintiff seeks an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
However, as Frank Pasquale [1] rightly suggests in his thoughtful foreword, this is also “a collection that should be read by a wide range of audiences both in and around the legal profession” (p v). [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
That does not involve any delegation of state power, any more than Conway Hall exercises delegated state power when it decides on its venue hiring policy. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]