Search for: "HARRIS V. STATE, ET AL."
Results 381 - 400
of 479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2019, 10:26 am
Delta Airlines Inc., et al., the 11th Circuit noted that, “while Fifth Third may have changed the legal analysis of our prior decision, it does not alter the outcome. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
National Bank of Daingerfield, et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm
If the motion is granted, the court of appeals shall reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.MARIA DEL CARMEN GUILBOT SERROS DE GONZALEZ, ET AL. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
Barris et al: fielding occasional calls about one’s job is a “professional courtesy” that does not interfere with FMLA rights (FMLA claims dismissed) Persson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Zuckerberg et al.Decision Date: June 16, 2019 The United States District Court Northern District of California dismissed a First Amendment claim against Facebook. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Thomas Dale Delay et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
” State ex reI. 2 Dunlap v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
Back on the terra firma of the Patents Court, Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) was asked by Teva et al to provide his judgment in light of the CJEU's decision. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
The Kraft Heinz Co. et al. in the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
” Garrou v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
The three-judge panel was unanimous in Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
