Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc."
Results 381 - 400
of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 11:31 am
Inc., 592 F. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:36 am
Hollister Inc., 863 F.2d 867 (Fed. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
On 24 September 2019, whilst the country was focused on the United Kingdom Supreme Court as it ruled that the prorogation of the UK parliament was unlawful, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or ECJ), handed down judgment in Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), C‑507/17, effectively a sequel to the landmark data protection ‘Google Spain’ decision… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm
The bite that the decedent received was two small puncture wounds on his hand. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:31 am
One of the ways in which he tries to optimize his workstream is that he takes a relatively long time to rule on--guess what--venue transfer motions.On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit handed down its decision In re.: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:27 am
Last fall, a panel of the Seventh Circuit handed down Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Bigelow, Inc. caught our attention. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
The United States District of Illinois filed criminal charges against two of the country's largest industrial honey suppliers, Groeb Farms, Inc. and Honey Solutions. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:55 pm
In PGA West Residential Association, Inc. et al., v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
In that case, fair use was limited to works that transformed the original through use of parody or satire - this is juxtaposes the current environment, which noticeably reduces the rights of photographers in their works through the expansion of fair use, as evident in Cariou v Prince in 2013, and Rentmeester v Nike, Inc. in 2018.This is further explored through an examination of the Andy Warhol case, which further illustrates the expansion of the fair use exception to the detriment… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:20 pm
Prentice was originally filed on July 11, 2012. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:33 am
On the other hand, if an applicant is using the name of a weekly comedy television show as a mark, “television broadcasting services” would not be appropriate because the mark does not serve to identify and distinguish the electrical transmission of the program. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Ltd. to pay Tomita Technologies International, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:20 pm
Ltd. to pay Tomita Technologies International, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:03 am
Indeed, some of the allegedly infringing products – such as Samsung’s original Galaxy Tab 10.1, and Apple’s iPhone 3GS – are now two or more generations old. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Under U.S. copyright law, “original works of art” are capable of protection, whereas “useful articles” are not. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:13 am
Mastercard, Inc., a summary order issued on March 6. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:45 am
Ltd. to pay Tomita Technologies International, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of California (Apple Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
United Parcel Service Inc., N.D. [read post]
