Search for: "Hicks v State"
Results 381 - 400
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 1:56 pm
In PPL v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Investigation by ISP Hicks, Badge No. 207. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
The Tennessee Court of appeals recently affirmed a jury’s defense verdict in a rear-end car crash case in Hicks v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
The Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Ziglar v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
United States, No. 06-1196: "1. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
Mary’s Honor Center v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
Hicks v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 9:14 am
Dominic Crossley is a Partner of Payne Hicks Beach within the Privacy & Media Law Team. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Hicks v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Hicks, 539 U.S. 113, 119 (2003). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:53 pm
State v. [read post]
