Search for: "Hicks v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Hicks, 539 U.S. 113, 119 (2003). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:53 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:17 am
” Agostino v Hicks, 845 A2d 1110, 1121 (Del Ch 2004) (cited in Tooley, 845 A2d at 1036). [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
(Thursday night I ducked out of the reception early, to catch the Padres v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:51 pm
Earlier this year, in a case called State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
State Bar gave Rick something of a victory, though the release of the records is by no means guaranteed:Appellants Richard Sander, Joe Hicks and the California First Amendment Coalition seek access to admissions records from the State Bar of California (the Bar), subject to conditions designed to ensure the privacy of bar applicants, in order to conduct academic research on discrepancies in bar passage rates among racial and ethnic groups. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:51 pm
Earlier this year, in a case called State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Wirt represented the Cherokee in the 1831 U.S. court case, Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
” For generations since, first-year contracts professors have used Lumley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
As I understand the state of play, this is not a topic on which economists agree. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm
” The note then goes on to quote the decision of the Court of Appeal in Waterson Hicks v Eliopoulous, 14 November 1995 CA; Costs Law Reports (Core Volume) 363. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
George Hicks (Kirkland) is counsel of record on the other side. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
As I understand the state of play, this is not a topic on which economists agree. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
As I understand the state of play, this is not a topic on which economists agree. [read post]
