Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 381 - 400
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 9:02 am
Another interesting issue is the extent to which the right to legal representation will be available to private sector employees. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
Jacob LJ concluding that:[50] “…the Judge was wrong to hold that Mrs Sig was guilty of breach of confidence. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
As Elias LJ was at pains to point out, the common law still confers no right to strike in this country. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:26 am
It was submitted that Hale LJ and others in Brownlie 1 were incorrect in holding that it was acceptable to have wide jurisdictional gateways since the court’s discretion could be exercised at the forum non conveniens stage. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
Nevertheless, this Kat disagrees with the principles behind the judge’s analysis and wonders what readers make of it.The case is not without other interest, and the IPKat may return to it in future posts: in particular the judgment contains an intriguing postscript detailing why a critical section had to be rewritten after it was circulated in draft form to the parties and was criticised by the patentee. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Initial interest confusion was n [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
However, the decision and how it was reached also raise a number of points of interest for practitioners – and it certainly will not represent a rolling back of defamation law’s ability to respond to social media events. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
(Nadarajah v Secretary of State[2005] EWCA Civ 1363) Whether a promise should be honoured depends upon the respective force of the competing interests in the case. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Waller LJ gives the judgment of the CA, but Patten LJ gives a supporting judgment which specifically considers the position in Manchester CC v Mushin. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Waller LJ gives the judgment of the CA, but Patten LJ gives a supporting judgment which specifically considers the position in Manchester CC v Mushin. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:59 pm
Here – the 10 most-read Legal Cheek Stories of 2013 : From Ward LJ “This case involves a number of – and here I must not fall into Dr Spooner’s error – warring bankers. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Barbara Ellen writes in The Observer: Twitter at its worst is not Bercow, but the braying mob - The Twitter villains are the bullies who feel scant responsibility and a lack of interest in fairness Patrick Strudwick forecasts doom: Sally Bercow’s Lord McAlpine libel: Twitter is over. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Barbara Ellen writes in The Observer: Twitter at its worst is not Bercow, but the braying mob - The Twitter villains are the bullies who feel scant responsibility and a lack of interest in fairness Patrick Strudwick forecasts doom: Sally Bercow’s Lord McAlpine libel: Twitter is over. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:10 am
The decision may be of interest for a number of reasons. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:02 pm
In response, the question Jacobs LJ asked is significant: That boils down, as I see it, to a simple question: could the court be satisfied that there was no longer any real risk that the appellant would not do to the property that which he had done before? [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 3:36 am
(You can opt out of spiders on LJ too, of course - but the option is distinctly not that obvious.) [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
"Here, the intentions of the parties did change, and it was logical to infer that Mr Kernott's interest crystallised in 1995 (paragraph 48). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:46 am
Given that Neurim was a reference from the English Court of Appeal (on appeal from a decision of Arnold J) in which Jacob LJ stated: “In short, if Neurim are wrong [and an SPC should not be granted], then the Regulation will not have achieved its key objects for large areas of pharmaceutical research: it will not be fit for purpose”, it will be interesting to see what happens. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm
The judge noted that although he “inclined to agree” that the publication of the photographs per se served little public interest, it is the public interest in the non-disclosure of press sources that the court must protect – “As forcefully pointed out by Laws LJ in the Ashworth Hospital Authority case [Ashworth Hospital Authority v MGN Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2033], such public interest is constant whatever the merits of the… [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:35 pm
After contact with the pick-up truck, AS's Jeep was apparently propelled into the southbound lanes of I-87, where it was struck by a vehicle owned by defendant Y and operated by defendant LJ. [read post]
