Search for: "In Re Mdl" Results 381 - 400 of 1,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
  Most notably, the issue received a thorough airing before an MDL judge in In re Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation, 2015 WL 3669933 (N.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
The summary judgment decision in In re Accutane Litigation, No. 271 (MCL), 2015 N.J. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
May 22, 2015) and   In re Tylenol (Acetominophen) Mktg., Sales Prac. and Prods. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:25 am by Robert Kreisman
In re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2599 (U.S. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:06 am
  See Pretrial Order #59, In re Cook Medical, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:35 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Doherty in the Western District of Louisiana, as part of an MDL, or Multi-District Litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:35 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Doherty in the Western District of Louisiana, as part of an MDL, or Multi-District Litigation. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
  The court decided that this was enough to deny summary judgment and, in fact, re-open discovery on Dr. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  If they could not, then each forum shopping plaintiff faced the choice of 1) not re-filing, 2) re-filing in her home jurisdiction (where there would be probably specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant), or 3) coming up with some other way to avoid removal. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:09 pm
”  Id. at *37.Finally, with regard to “duplication or proliferation of litigation – the seventh statutory factor” the Panel disagreed with petitioners’ contention that they would be forced to start at “ground zero” if required to re-file in their home states, pointing out that “any plaintiff family who re-files in their home state will have access to the significant discovery that Pfizer has already produced,” as well as to… [read post]
Initially, the Attorney General filed this suit in the West Virginia state court; however, upon removal by the defendants to the federal court, the case was transferred to the District of New Jersey by the Multi-District Litigation Panel as a part of the In re Plavix MDL. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:01 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Doherty in the Western District of Louisiana, as part of an MDL, or Multi-District Litigation. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Dec. 1, 2011) (same); In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1996 WL 900353, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am by Schachtman
Litig., MDL No. 2342; 12-md-2342, 2014 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:35 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
The consolidated Actos case in Louisiana is In Re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, 11-md-02299, U.S. [read post]