Search for: "In Re Powers"
Results 381 - 400
of 49,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 9:22 am
What Is Res Ipsa Loquitur? [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:09 pm
Works offline Because Frenzy uses Dropbox, your feed items sync whenever you’re next online. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:25 am
Lawyer marketing efforts need to be re-invented to remain relevant. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:05 pm
The case is styled In re ExGen Texas Power, LLC, et al. and is case number 17-12377 pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:05 pm
The case is styled In re ExGen Texas Power, LLC, et al. and is case number 17-12377 pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
The case of Re W (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 999, decided today, involved a father's successful appeal against the dismissal of his application for direct contact with his daughters. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm
After the thoroughly depressing experience of wading through Erwin Chemerinsky’s newish book, The Conservative Assault on the Constitution, we’re ready for some good news.read more [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
/**/ I have just read the report of Re N (A Child) [2009] EWHC 3055 (Fam) (25 November 2009), which has just appeared on Bailii. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:34 pm
Shoemaker, Re-Placing Property, 91 U. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:44 am
A proactive approach is always best when you suspect you’re at an increased risk of heart disease. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
In the run-up to his re-election campaign in 2014, he doesn't need to lose GOP support. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:35 am
I mean, often times Powers of Attorney for Property say they’re effective immediately. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:48 am
The Crown retained the ancient power as parens patriae over those who owe it allegiance as British nationals. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 12:58 pm
“There is some confusion on that, and so we’re working on some amendment to make it clear,” stated Smith. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]