Search for: "In Re Senior Appeals Examiners" Results 381 - 400 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2013, 2:49 am by John L. Welch
In re Fawad Motiwala dba California Hub, Serial No. 85108655 (May 1, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:01 am by Charon QC
What are DBAs and do they need Re-examination? [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:01 am by Charon QC
What are DBAs and do they need Re-examination? [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
On the other hand, Médecins Sans Frontières noted that '[t]he Supreme Court's decision now makes patents on the medicines that we desperately need less likely. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Judge Evans specifically found that the e-reserves at GSU were not transformative, and that is a point that the Appeals Court should re-examine carefully. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:40 am by Guest Blogger
 Linda Greenhouse is a Senior Research Scholar in Law, the Knight Distinguished Journalist in Residence and Joseph Goldstein Lecturer in Law at Yale Law School. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:03 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:50 am by Neil Ford
In June this year the Information Commissioner ruled the academy should provide the figures but Outwood appealed the decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
 We are of the opinion that the above three decisions require to be re-considered as, in our opinion, something which cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am by Robert Steele
Therefore, I re-examined the Ethics Bowl hypothetical and asked the question, “What do the roles of officer and advocate require me to do? [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:30 am by David Oscar Markus
Apple has generally disputed the appeal of devices smaller than its 9.7-inch iPad, despite reports the company is developing a smaller model.In cross-examination, Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  Frost told the inquiry: “Lord Hunt in his evidence said editors set the standards and they’re leaders. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Legal Beagle
The outstanding litigation between Mr McNamara and Tods Murray saw a rigorous examination of Tods Murray’s fees for professional services to Arakin in the 1990s and the sums paid to account by Arakin. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The latter decision has been described (unofficially) by some senior examiners as “barking” (not Barking in Essex), a term painful to the ears of cats. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
Other complaints concern the lack of any facility to contact the examiner (telephone not answered; no voicemail; voicemail messages not returned [perhaps they're all on Twitter here, wonders Merpel]), and lack of clarity as to how to reach a more senior examiner or supervisor. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:33 am by Susan Brenner
Benedict, supra.)Benedict raised two issues on appeal, only one of which we’re concerned with. [read post]