Search for: "In Re Strauss" Results 381 - 400 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
After all, we’re supposed to look at the whole text. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:18 am by SHG
Stephanie pointed me to Strauss–Howe generational theory, which provides a pretty good explanation for generational differences. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The appeal stayed the trial judge's decision to stream the trial to the Internet and subject all of us to reading about the case, or suffering through a painful re-enactment of the trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Instead, the fact/nonfact distinction limits and channels defamation liability in a way that, first, we hope is objective and thus more protective of speech than a subjective standard, and second, we believe limits liability when factfinders would be inclined to protect powerful and respected figures over marginal characters—both when the marginal characters are plaintiffs and when they’re defendants. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:55 pm by Stephen Griffin
  So, perhaps unlike some living constitutionalists like David Strauss, I certainly accept the text (and the doctrines I have been describing) as binding law. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
  COVID-19 has become a permission, a a signal, and perhaps an incarnation of Tod und Verklärung (Death and Transfiguration)--a reference to the famous tone poem of that name written in 1889by Richard Strauss. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Fancy Feast Filet Mignon Flavor with Real Seafood and Shrimp: fish and shrimp are the eighth and ninth ingredients, but they’re minor ingredients, and there’s no beef at all. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:20 am
"Just because someone says ... they're a rainmaker, doesn't mean they're making rain. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
As for the future, the recent trend of legislating from the bench - cases such as KSR, eBay, In re Seagate etc. have drastically limited the value of this business model. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Spicy IP)   Israel Israel applies to be PCT international search authority (The IP Factor) Tel Aviv District Court refuses preliminary injunction to Strauss Ice Creams who claims packaging on Nestle’s ‘La Cremeria’ ice cream infringes its ‘Cremisimo’ ice cream (The IP Factor)   Kenya Africa Growth and Opportunity Act: Trade breaks or heartbreaks? [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:44 am
Could be Che Guevara or Picasso or Levi Strauss or the guy who invented widgets; anyone you think is important. 43. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:32 am by Ron
Working across boundaries requires re-negotiating status (who’s in charge). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
“If the court were to hold the decision in abeyance pending confirmation of the next justice, rather than issue the decision with eight justices, it will create more delay and provide a basis for re-examining whether existing Spokeo stays should be lifted. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:14 am by David G. Badertscher
Other seasoned trial attorneys say if you're going to use sarcasm, just be selective about it.Few lawyers — including the nine lawyers who wear robes to work — know the Supreme Court's docket as well as Roy Englert Jr. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:21 am
For much of the term, the justices seemed to be more harmonious and unanimous, but in the cases that won the most headlines, the Court's splits re-emerged. [read post]