Search for: "In re Civil Commitment of Ince" Results 381 - 400 of 870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am by MBettman
In re Anderson, 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67 (2001) (juvenile courts are civil and not criminal courts and should therefore focus on rehabilitation and care of the child.) [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
This affects not merely business enterprises, but is at the heart of civil and criminal cases involving other enterprises--for example state assisted universities. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
They deserve a hearing to explain themselves and their non-compliance before any order for commitment is issued. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:00 am
"We're calling it the Titanic State Hospital," said a psychiatric technician who, like most other current employees, spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing reprisal from administrators. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:52 am by Morris Turek
  So, the cancellation proceeding will probably now be suspended pending the disposition of the civil court action. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
" In Re the Matter of M.J., Elika Jackson, and Carl Jackson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
28 USC 1442(a)(1) permits removal to federal court of a criminal prosecution (or civil action) against defendants “for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Chen argued the cause for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (Stephen M. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
After the merger between Capital Control (Delaware) and Severn Trent, the former had effectively met its "civil death", and its shares had then devolved upon the latter.The Court relied on a string of English decision beginning from In Re a Company [(1894) 2 Ch. 394] to negate these contentions. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am by Schachtman
Gunderson, 279 S.W.3d 93, 102 (Ky. 2008) (describing a small increased risk as being considered statistically insignificant and a somewhat larger risk as being considered statistically significant.); In re Pfizer Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
While it has been clear for nine months that Kent Roberts, the former general counsel of McAfee Inc., is in trouble, there's been a string of delays in his case. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:00 am by Michael C. Smith
Motion to Compel re: Depositions In the first, the Court granted the plaintiff DDR's motion to compel defendant Digital River, Inc. to produce a corporate representative for deposition regarding the methods, processes and technology that power five (5) of Digital River’s e-commerce platforms. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am by Bona Law PC
And that was a big deal because it basically re-defined what Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires for a complaint to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) FRCP. [read post]