Search for: "In re Daniel H." Results 381 - 400 of 484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:37 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
“[H]uman nature may incline even one acting in subjective good faith to rationalize as right that which is merely personally beneficial. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
What excuse did the White House give for its investigation of Daniel Schorr? [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:13 am by Jim Baker, Sarah Grant
By the time of the Nixon-Petersen interactions cited in the road map—late March and April 1973—that we detail below, the president was well aware of the involvement of the White House and the Committee to Re-Elect the President (CRP) in the break-in and was an active participant in the cover-up. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
 Pix Credit Museum Panama City, Panama For those who might have an interest, I have posted for comment or reaction, a discussion draft of my essay, Overcoming the Human, Rights, and the State in Human Rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:01 am by Bradford Dismukes, Barry Blechman
  Daniel Byman *** Roughly 40 percent of Ukraine’s exports are agricultural products, especially grain, the vast majority of which move by ship over the Black Sea. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Rev. 731 (2013)); Daniel Lyne and Ted Folkman of Murphy & King were kind enough to serve as our pro bono counsel. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Abstract: This paper explores the responses to Judge Sonia Sotomayor as symptomatic of new or inferential racism and sexism, which appears to include people of color and challenges systems of power, but in actuality serves to re-center whiteness and maleness. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]