Search for: "In re Head (1986)" Results 381 - 400 of 421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am by Grant Tudor
Office of Legal Counsel opinions (initially in 1984 and 1986) offer prosecutorial discretion and executive privilege claims as justifications for an attorney general’s refusal to present a criminal contempt citation against an executive official to a grand jury, in contravention of statute; and, without apparent justification, dismiss the constitutionality of inherent contempt altogether. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:45 pm by Guest Blogger
Nicholas Parrillo This post is part of an online symposiumdiscussing Nicholas Parrillo, Against the Profit Motive: The Salary Revolution in American Government, 1780-1940(Yale University Press 2013). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
Summary: This discussion paper is intended to address the following question put forward in the OPC’s consultation paper on online reputation: “Can the right to be forgotten find application in the Canadian context and, if so, how? [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Gateway and Dell and Microsoft (CAFC 2008-1485, -1487, -1495) precedential The centerpiece of this hydra-headed ruling is damages. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Friedrich court was referring to In Re Bates, High Court of Justice, Family Division, Royal Courts of London, No. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
What better way than to murder the head of the Catholic truth commission? [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 We are very familiar with this regulatory regime because we both voted to dissent from the FCC’s 2023 decision to head back down the path of reinstating those regulations.[4] There are several reasons why the FCC’s 2015 net neutrality rules failed First Amendment scrutiny that are not present in this social media context. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
España Service, 117 D.P.R. 729, 745 (1986).Notwithstanding, it is clear that the judgment of the trier of fact is due deference, but is not absolute. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Indeed, the only thing that has may be emerging with any degree of clarity may be that the generation-long effort to patch, re-patch, and patch the patches of the tatters of the old Soviet Marxist-Leninist model which was from the first ill transposed to the Spanish Caribbean has produced little more than ever more elegant restatements of objectives that cannot be met constructed out of principles that remained as immovable as Biblical text but which posited a world the reality of which had… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am by CFM Admin
As we head into 2020, we have put together this checklist and update to help managers stay on top of the business and regulatory landscape for the coming year. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
This article was published by the ABA Antitrust Section’s Unilateral Conduct Committee in its Monopoly Matters journal for Spring 2013. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm by Steven Hansen
’’; and(5) in the heading of paragraph (5) (as so redesignated), by striking ‘‘EXCEPTION’’ and inserting‘‘EXCLUSION’’.SEC. 3. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
  She attended Hunter College High School, Princeton (graduating in 1981), and Harvard Law School (graduating in 1986). [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by Schachtman
The head of the working group exhibited a serious conflict of interest, by promoting his own study as the rationale for the working group’s decision. [read post]