Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 381 - 400
of 29,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 2:35 am
Just two days after oral argument, the Board issued its decision in In re Himalaya Global Holdings, Ltd., Serial No. 77117183 (May 14, 2010) [not precedential], reversing a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark SOLIGA FOREST HONEY for honey [FOREST HONEY disclaimed]. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:47 am
In re Global Brand Partners Pte Ltd, Serial No. 97102423 (March 18, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark Lebow). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:44 pm
They probably should be, but they’re not, not in the culture we live in. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1688-1689 (Fed. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:09 am
” In re Code Consultants Inc., 60 USPQ2d at 1700. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
The Court of First Instance roared into action today when it dismissed the appeal of choco-champs Ferrero against OHIM's refusal to uphold their opposition to the registration as a Community trade mark of the sign depicted above in Case Tâ€â [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
In re Sunland, Inc., Serial Nos. 77310231 and 77307289 (August 7, 2009) [not precedential].Of course, the two block-letter marks are "virtually identical. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:52 pm
The truth is, they’re not very strong. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Information provided by Mark A. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 11:00 am
The 9th Circuit recently decided that "“The Freecycle Network"—a non-profit organization facilitating the free re-use of unwanted items by others—abandoned the mark FREECYCLE because it failed to exert adequate quality control over its loose network of local affiliates.The court based its conclusion on the facts that: (1) there was no express licensing agreement between the main organization and its affiliates; (2) a directive to affiliates not to use… [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 1:23 pm
” Medtronic, 891 F.3d at 1380 (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
In re Accelerate s.a.l., 101 USPQ2d 2047, 2049 (TTAB 2012). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 11:43 pm
See, e.g., In re Hudson News Co., 39 USPQ2d at 1923. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:09 am
In re Pearl 9 Group LLC, Serial No. 86539117 (October 11, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lorelei Ritchie). [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:43 am
A real estate brokerage’s proposed mark was likely to be confused with a prior registration, the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:25 am
Mark is a graduate of Tulane University. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
In re Guitar Straps Online, LLC, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1745 (TTAB 2012) [precedential].Proposed amendment: The Board noted that if the proposed amendment adding a question mark were permitted, the amended drawing would comport with the specimens of use, and the second refusal would be moot. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 2:45 pm
Or they’re simply things some users want to read and others don’t. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 10:56 am
The post All the Money in the World: Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Williams, and Wage Disparity Issues appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 10:56 am
The post All the Money in the World: Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Williams, and Wage Disparity Issues appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
