Search for: "In re Wells (1971)" Results 381 - 400 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 10:48 am by Jason Rantanen
  But in 1995, in In re Lockwood, the Seventh Amendment question is presented for the first and only time to the Federal Circuit. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Freeman, 474 F.2d 1318, 1323 (CCPA 1973 ); In re Landgraf, 436 F.2d 1046, 1049-1050 (CCPA 1971); In re Muchmore, 433 F.2d 824, 826 (CCPA 1970).As to "unexpected results," the Board noted that the specification did not characterize the results at issue as "unexpected." [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:02 am by Jon
Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), in which abused citizens finally won money damages against federal agents for violating their rights, after a long struggle to get to the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
While both seminal authors and up-and-comers in the field have provided a trove of knowledge on the topic, it is only recently that personal accounts and perspectives of the internment have garnered much attention (Looking like the Enemy, Mary Gruenewald, 2005; Journey to Topaz, Yoshiko Uchida, 1971). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Concerning burden switching [as in In re Best]:“It is well settled that the recitation of a new intended use for an old product does not make a claim to that old product patentable. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Gritsforbreakfast
According to the LBB, Texas established periodic commissions to evaluate sentences in the penal code about once per decade beginning in 1971, but the last such effort occurred in the early '90s, making such a re-evaluation long overdue. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
 In re DiLeone, 436 F.2d 1404, 1405 n.1 (C.C.P.A. 1971) (DiLeone II). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm by Bexis
  That’s right old-fashioned diethylstilbestrol– prohibited from use in pregnant women by the FDA since 1971. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:00 am by Bernadette Duran-Brown
 You can’t present inadmissible evidence, and if that wipes out your whole case, oh well. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210, 213 (CCPA 1971). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 pm by dré cummings
  When asked about Florida State's mascot Chief Osceola, Means responded that "we’re the only entire ethnicity in America that is still stereotyped. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 2:39 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Unless you’re a regular -- or even occasional follower -- of the machinations of the nation’s Christianist Right, you may wonder what AFA is all about. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm by Roshonda Scipio
.] : West [c2012]KF9619.3 .S25 2012DiversityMoving diversity forward :  how to go from well-meaning to well-doing / [VernÌ„Ä  A. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm by Orin Kerr
The answer to that question will turn in part on the expectations of privacy that computer users have in their e-mails—an inquiry that may well shift over time, that assuredly shifts from internet-service agreement to internet-service agreement and that requires considerable knowledge about ever-evolving technologies[.] [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:40 am by royblack
If the facts were not so well documented, I would think this story was made up. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  So, if you rest your hand on the surface, as well as the finger that you want to point with, you confuse the poor thing. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Parker) skewered Bickel in a 1971 Harvard Law Review commentary on The Supreme Court [read post]