Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)" Results 381 - 400 of 718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm by Ken White
It's not something broad like "Baptist" or "Agnostic" that you'd expect to encompass a wide range of views. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
I’m glad to hear this, since I think the dissenting judge on the panel had the much better argument. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:48 pm by Clark
His answer, though, made me realize that I'd accidentally asked a really interesting question. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Grits hasn't closely followed the campaign finance case against Tom DeLay overturned this week by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (see the majority opinion), but the concurring and dissenting opinions were especially interesting. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
 As I’m on the road (returning from a debate on the merits in these cases with Professor Nicholas Bagley at the University of Michigan Law School), I’ll just post the concluding section of Judge White’s opinion. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
The majority disagreed in some detail, in responding to the state’s petition for rehearing, but one telling passage is this: The District Attorney is content to embrace the dissenting opinion on original submission and to ask rhetorically, “Are we a society governed by law or by the fastest gun? [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Among other additional findings, a majority found that the restaurant’s internet/blogging policy was unlawful; Member Miscimarra dissented on this point (Three D, LLC dba Triple Play Sports Bar and Grille, August 22, 2014). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Dissent says she’s author of nothing. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Kasky dissent in the California Supreme Court, or the dissent in the recent DC Circuit country of origin labeling en banc opinion [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reynolds and unfairly revisited.Judge Brown also dissented, quite vigorously. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
If judges do not have the interest or the time to render the required service, they should say so. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
I therefore thought I’d post the current rough draft, so you folks can tell me where I’m wrong or unclear, and how the brief can be otherwise improved. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  The government would then bear the burden of showing that denial of an exemption “(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:48 am
I’m inclined to say the Attorney General’s position is at least plausible, given the breadth of the Washington law, and probably correct; but I thought I’d note the issue, and point interested readers to both the U.S. [read post]