Search for: "J L S Holdings LLC"
Results 381 - 400
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
’” William J. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:40 am
All other relief requests are denied. 11-04550 Anderson & Strudwick, Inc.; Anderson & Strudwick Investment Corporation Donald J. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 7:10 am
., LLC, No. 2013-1326 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
., ORBITZ, LLC, AND TRIP NETWORK, INC. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
Holdings/Conclusion: We affirm the district court’s order affirming the administrative action taken by the OAH. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
J. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:05 am
L. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Selikoff,” 37 Internat’l J. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
(f/k/a Plimus).David J. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
Holdings/Conclusion: The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting Big-D’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:27 am
JAMES L. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:42 am
Nicholas L. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:19 pm
Attorney Paul J. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Falkvinge amusingly noted that when it comes to such debates, “it’s not a logic game but a numbers game,” and “[i]t’s about looking like the winning team. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 11:14 am
Holdings: We disagree with some of the district court’s rationale; however, we conclude, in the end, it did not abuse its discretion. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
Mobley, and Marty L. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
L. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:48 am
Attorney Paul J. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
” However, the Ninth Circuit, in In re L&J Anaheim Associates, 995 F.2d 940 (1993), held that § 1129(a)(10) does not distinguish between discretionary and economically driven impairment. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
” However, the Ninth Circuit, in In re L&J Anaheim Associates, 995 F.2d 940 (1993), held that § 1129(a)(10) does not distinguish between discretionary and economically driven impairment. [read post]
