Search for: "John Doe Corporation and/or Limited Liability Company"
Results 381 - 400
of 647
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2014, 1:37 pm
Developed under the mandate of John Ruggie as Special Representative to the UN Secretary General on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, the GPs provide – for the first time – a global standard for preventing and addressing the risk of adverse impacts on human rights linked to business activity. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
In 1989 the plaintiff, John Doe, sued the Diocese of Saint John’s and it’s Archbishop for compensation for abuse that John Doe suffered as a result of sexual assaults perpetrated by a priest employed by the Diocese, James Hickey. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
John J. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
The robust safe harbour provisions set out in Section 512, limit a service provides direct, vicarious and contributor infringement liability for four acts – transmitting, caching, storing and linking to infringing copyright-protected content. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
The Government Pension Fund is an instrument for general saving and does not have clearly defined future liabilities. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:27 am
” In fact, as recounted in the brief, this legal separateness is “the corporation’s most precious characteristic,” according to one early American treatise writer, because it creates “limited liability” for business founders and investors, shielding their personal assets. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Malesko (2001), John Malesko sued the corporation running the community correction center in which he was housed, charging that the corporation and some of its employees were “negligent in failing to obtain requisite medication for [his] condition and were further negligent by refusing [him] the use of the elevator. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
The Bureau also announced that it would be updating its two key competition law compliance related guidelines: the Conformity Continuum and Corporate Compliance Programs Bulletins (see: “Remarks by John Pecman, Commissioner of Competition”, Toronto, Ontario (October 24, 2013)). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
Contrary to German Stock Companies, there is no general duty to pursue claims against Managing Directors of Limited Liability Companies. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
Contrary to German Stock Companies, there is no general duty to pursue claims against Managing Directors of Limited Liability Companies. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
(`Advanced’), a Rhode Island corporation and medical practice that provides various medical imaging services. . . . [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
If the entity continues unchanged but its former owners and managers are replaced, to whom does the attorney-client privilege run? [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:04 am
However, ISS’s policy currently is to recommend voting against term limits for directors. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Blasi for the proposition that “any person who procures employment–any individual, any corporation, any manager–is a talent agency subject to regulation. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
The Proposed Rules also specify that companies shall not compensate, directly or indirectly, anyone to promote its offerings outside of the communication channels provided by the intermediary, unless the promotion is limited to Issuer Notices. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:27 pm
The Second Circuit held that Morrison clearly extended the limitation on Section 10(b) to criminal as well as civil liability. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:39 am
Arthur "Skin" Edge, a lobbyist for MAG Mutual Insurance Company, which provides medical liability insurance for doctors in nine states including Georgia. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Lanza (a medical director of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) in hiding the extent of acute silicosis amongst the tunnellers. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:32 am
John Dory LLC which, as far as I knew at the time, was the sole decision by a New York court in which a dissenting member of a limited liability company (LLC) sought to block an allegedly unlawful freeze-out merger. [read post]
