Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
Arthrex, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm
Other methods of service are possible but will be more expensive and time consuming for the plaintiff.2. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
" Opposer MLS alleged two grounds: Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion and Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:13 am
Ives Labs., Inc., 456 U.S. 844, 214 USPQ 1, 4 n.10 (1982)). [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:44 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966)] requires that the trier assess certain underlying facts: (1) the scope and content of the prior art, (2) the level of ordinary skill in the art, (3) the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art, and (4) the so-called 'secondary considerations.'"), with Hakim v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 2:35 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:09 am
Wilson, Senior IP Counsel, and John S. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:47 am
" [here]Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:16 am
TEXAS LOVE thus fails to function as a trade mark under Sections 1, 2 and 45 of the Trade mark Act. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
§ 24-2-1-2(8), (9). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:20 pm
By John W. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
R.C. 2919.191 (Heartbeat Provisions) R.C. 5101.804(A)(1) (Parenting and Pregnancy Provisions) ProgressOhio.org., Inc. v. [read post]
TTAB Finds KOTA JAPAN Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive for Knife Sharpening Tools
18 Jun 2020, 3:22 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:30 am
The defendant made the classic defensive argument that the prior art is so similar to the accused product that either (1) the patent is invalid [if broadly interpreted] or (2) the patent is not infringed [if narrowly interpreted]. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
John Elwood reviews the relists from the “long conference” … barely. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
The injury in fact should be “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical” (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 3:35 am
So marks may be registered "under" Section 2(f) but they can't be refused under Section 2(f).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:16 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
