Search for: "John Doe et al" Results 381 - 400 of 1,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
For more on the underlying issues, I recommend some of the papers from this Health Matrix symposium on corporate wellness programs, particularly the papers by Bagley, et al., and Sam Bagenstos. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Davis Polk memo explains: The case, Susquehanna International Group, LLP, et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
” The ACLU and lawyers for two military psychologists who helped develop the CIA’s post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program released a statement announcing a settlement today in Salim et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Next Door Company, et al., a claimant proceeding “without the aid of competent counsel” would be as “helpless as a turtle on its back. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Schachtman
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:57 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
” This facile explanation does not adequately address concerns of a family member who wants to give their loved one every possible chance, arguing, “But she’ll die if you don’t! [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
While sales taxes are somewhat regressive, this does not make sales tax holidays an effective tool for providing relief to low-income individuals. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 137 S.Ct. 810 (2017)Ricky HENSON, et al., petitioners,v.SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., et al.No. 16-349.Supreme Court of United States.January 13, 2017.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.RICKY HENSON, ET AL., Petitioners,v.SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.No. 16-349.Supreme Court of the United States.Argued April 18, 2017.Decided June 12, 2017.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT… [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am by Schachtman
“The Slemp Case, Part I – Jury Verdict for Plaintiff – 10 Initial Observations” (May 13, 2017) The legal community is still trying to grasp the enormity of the $110M verdict against Johnson & Johnson, in the Slemp case. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
Thomas Todd, WLF] No, Kaiser Health News and Scientific American, a 1-in-3 rate of post-marketing drug safety alerts does not prove FDA too lax [“Scott Alexander,” Slate Star Codex] Jim Hood Watch: “Mississippi AG, with the help of outside attorneys, sues pharma companies over allegedly unapproved drugs” [Jessica Karmasek, Legal Newsline] When deconstruction met evidence-based medicine and denunciations of “microfascism” ensued [Dave Holmes… [read post]