Search for: "Key v. Grant"
Results 381 - 400
of 8,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:28 am
This might explain why the pilot survey apparently was not directed to the key issue in this case: secondary meaning. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
In a recent decision, the Second Circuit reversed a district court's grant of a motion to dismiss in a trademark infringement case. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:10 am
Whether or not a claim change in post grant patent proceeding results in the an intervening rights defense is far from a straightforward determination as evidenced by the recent decision Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
But by granting the motion for rehearing, the Court has given itself more time to think about the issues. 3 Improvident grant: Aggie bonfire case Zachry Construction Corp., et al. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:14 pm
By Jason Rantanen Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
In Fears v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently clarified renewal rights in the context of a commercial lease in The Zone Bowling Centre (2002) Ltd. v. 14100 Entertainment Blvd. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:12 pm
Last July, Judge Linda Quinn granted a motion for class certificationin Wilcox v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:26 pm
Based on what Bloomberg reported earlier this month, a second United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 11:01 am
More here from Damon Key colleague Rebecca Copeland. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 3:42 pm
The case, known as Jewel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:48 am
If the parties agree that voting rights will be granted by the seller/grantor, then this will be documented in the terms specific to the transaction. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
” The key is fundamental fairness, which is clearly contextual. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:46 am
On June 19, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Shilo Willis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
The Fourth Circuit (Traxler, C.J.) has issued a unanimous decision in Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. [read post]
