Search for: "King v. United States Government"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 3 CIT 219 (1982). [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
City of Charleston, in an opinion by Judge Robert King, joined by Judges J. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Consequently, assert Defendants, these diagnoses and tests are flawed, unreliable, untrustworthy and illegal and should, therefore, be inadmissible under Utah law governing the admissibility of expert testimony and under Utah’s public policy. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
United States Donald Trump’s lawyers have been arguing before New York’s highest court that the president is immune from a defamation lawsuit brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
“When somebody’s the president of the United States, the authority is total,” Trump said. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
§ 1182(f), which empowers the president to bar entry of foreign nationals who would be "detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
Its work included developing a state constitution, composing a bill of rights, and drafting a missive to the royal governor of South Carolina laying out the colonists’ grievances against the King. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:14 pm
Chepurko v. e-biofuels, LLP, et al. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
From Pinter-Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 2:52 am
United States, 546 F.3d 430, 434 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
