Search for: "L. TAYLOR"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm
Co., No. 3:09-cv-902-L-32MCR, 2011 WL 3235675, at *1 (M.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
This post offers concluding thoughts about the Ackies tracking device case, which I have written about here, here, and here. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 6:08 am
Last week, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Working Group III (WGIII) turned squarely to designing permanent adjudicative institutions for the resolution of investment disputes. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:26 pm
Unlike the mass culture of the 1970s, it does not tend to breed "capital L Libertarianism. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:14 am
Taylor. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
Hemileia Vastatrix on Coffee Leaves As Gail L. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:14 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
Scott Anderson, Margaret Taylor and Benjamin Wittes wrote a Starr Report-style record of the known facts so far in L’Affaire Ukrainienne. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:51 am
William Taylor described as “an irregular channel” for achieving Trump’s objectives in that country—a channel that was not always playing by the usual rules of diplomacy or bureaucratic lines of communication. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
For the symposium on David S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See, e.g., Taylor v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm
MichettiPipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999), then citingOmni Capital Int’l, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
District Judge Thomas L. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:18 am
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador appeared to dismiss Trump’s offer, according to the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:46 pm
Dodge, Jurisdictional reasonableness under customary international law: The approach of the Restatement (Fourth) of US Foreign Relations Law Natalie L. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
" As to PERB's declining to exercise a merits deferral, which, in contrast to a jurisdictional deferral, "utilizes agreed-upon binding arbitration to determine contractual grievances in furtherance of the stated goal of the Taylor Law to encourage employers and public employees to agree upon dispute resolution procedures, the Appellate Division held that PERB's action was proper. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
" As to PERB's declining to exercise a merits deferral, which, in contrast to a jurisdictional deferral, "utilizes agreed-upon binding arbitration to determine contractual grievances in furtherance of the stated goal of the Taylor Law to encourage employers and public employees to agree upon dispute resolution procedures, the Appellate Division held that PERB's action was proper. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
" As to PERB's declining to exercise a merits deferral, which, in contrast to a jurisdictional deferral, "utilizes agreed-upon binding arbitration to determine contractual grievances in furtherance of the stated goal of the Taylor Law to encourage employers and public employees to agree upon dispute resolution procedures, the Appellate Division held that PERB's action was proper. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
" As to PERB's declining to exercise a merits deferral, which, in contrast to a jurisdictional deferral, "utilizes agreed-upon binding arbitration to determine contractual grievances in furtherance of the stated goal of the Taylor Law to encourage employers and public employees to agree upon dispute resolution procedures, the Appellate Division held that PERB's action was proper. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Not surprisingly, the CJEU’s ruling was followed in subsequent cases, including the ruling in L’Oréal v Ebay (...). [read post]
