Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 381 - 400 of 2,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Berry responded: "absolutely not… if he (i.e., Gentry) felt coerced, I suppose he could put a declaration before the Superior Court…but he did not. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:33 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The defense files a motion to suppress evidence in superior court, and the judge sets the matter for a hearing. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:38 am
In a case demonstrating the challenges of addressing aboriginal representation on Ontario juries, the Ontario Superior Court has rejected an application to have a sheriff found guilty of fraud, partiality or wilful misconduct over the lack of First Nations members on the panel.In R. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
"In September 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent 1000 members of the 101st Airborne Division into Little Rock to desegregate Central Highschool in the wake of the Brown v Board of Ed decision. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 7:30 am
Superior Court (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d 1006 and Home Savings and Loan Association v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:37 pm by Anna Gelpern
With little to add to Mark's wonderful analysis of the Second Circuit decision in NML v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:21 pm
The first reference to Judge Kahn says: "As will be seen, it was Judge Kahn, a most experienced Superior Court judge, who presided over the case through its conclusion . . . . [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:14 pm by Brandon Kain
Facts of Van Breda and Charron The Supreme Court’s judgment in Van Breda dealt with a consolidated appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in two motions before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Club Resorts Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]