Search for: "Large v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 2,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2019, 3:24 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
New High Water Mark Recently the Ontario Superior Court considered a case in which the plaintiff was 62 years of age, with 37 years of employment and held the position of Senior Vice President with a large insurance company.[1] It was accepted by the Court that there were no comparable employment opportunities. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am by Jennifer Lynch
Notably, the court looked back to the Supreme Court’s decision in Ybarra v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
They are often found in the large firms. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:42 am by INFORRM
Decision in Magno v Balita On 23 May 2018 the Ontario Superior Court   of Justice released a decision involving a claim for internet defamation Magno v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
Burlison Law Group, APC et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, case # BP140980. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by John C. Manoog III
A recent jury verdict returned in a medical negligence case tried in the Hampden Superior Court is making headlines across the state. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm by Scott Koller
Superior Court decision in 2008, which said that a zip code does not constitute personally identifiable information. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm by M. Scott Koller
Superior Court decision in 2008, which said that a zip code does not constitute personally identifiable information. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court has quietly held that a police officer who shot at a fleeing motorist during a high-speed chase is immune from suit because the state of the law at the time of the shooting did not make it clear that he violated the Fourth Amendment in firing the shots.The case is Mullenix v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
HSH sued UBS in New York County Supreme Court, stating numerous claims, including negligent misrepresention and fraud. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:33 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The defense files a motion to suppress evidence in superior court, and the judge sets the matter for a hearing. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Superior Court motion decision, summarized on Slaw here, relied on the Arbitration Act, 1991, the International Commercial Arbitration Act, 2017, and case law such as Seidel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Jill Fitzgerald
This means that you are liable even if you take reasonable precautions to prevent harm.In a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court Case, Franciscus v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:58 am by Aaron Weems
The Pennsylvania Superior Court highlighted this latter fact in a recent ruling in the Childress v. [read post]