Search for: "Large v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 2,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
”  The very next day the Eighth Circuit reached the same conclusion in largely the same way in Vallone v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer
Superior courts deal with: More serious criminal offencesDivorcesCivil cases involving large sums of money If a party disagrees with the superior court judge’s decision, they can ask the province’s appeal court to review it. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The action itself was a putative class action, one of several coordinated actions pending in Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
That all changed with the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
Credit: Federal Circuit (what it looks like to argue there) One week ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
The Court remanded for consideration in light of Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 5:26 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Santa Cruz County, filed in the local Superior Court, the Salinas-based firm is fighting for the right to be allowed to deliver to these regions. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:57 am
Attorney General, [2006]The British Columbia Supreme Court awards large damage for prolonged harassment. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:59 am by Paul Adam
 The Ontario Courts have already found, for instance in the case of RA1 & RA2 v JM et al (Superior Court, 2013) that a so-called "bystander parent" can be liable for failing to protect a child. [read post]