Search for: "Little v. U.s.*"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
Woodland Village Nursing Center, Inc., et al. does little to change that reputation. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 9:52 am
Earlier this month and with little fanfare, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule that would invoke CMS’s rarely used retroactive-rulemaking authority to essentially ensure that, despite the Supreme Court’s adverse rulemaking decision in Azar v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 1:10 pm
Circuit’s much-awaited decision in ACA International v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
And it takes very little indeed to satisfy the latter element. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court on behalf of the American Insurance Association in Mach Mining v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 1:26 pm
The post Lackey v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 2:47 pm
See Incorp Services, Inc., v. [read post]
1 Jul 2006, 9:02 pm
Hollis has filed a defamation suit against the funny little website called dontdatehimgirl.com. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:07 pm
” Manarite v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm
In Polara Engineering v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 9:29 pm
In a U.S. 9th Circuit precedent, the court regarded both read and unread e-mail, or received and unreceived e-mail, as being in "electronic storage" under the SCA (See Theofel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
" United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:54 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
It'll come as little surprise to most Balkinization readers that I agree that Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021, as well as his other efforts to scuttle the 2020 election results (and other acts, as well), were high crimes or misdemeanors that warranted conviction and his disqualification from holding future federal office, whether or not his conduct amounted to engaging in an insurrection. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
