Search for: "MASSACHUSETTS v. WHITE" Results 381 - 400 of 721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm by Tanya Greene, Center for Justice
This finding supports an assertion we've long believed: opposition to the death penalty isn't a conservative v. liberal argument. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:15 am
A white pages website listed more than 300 Harringtons, and the People Finder database contained 30,887 telephone listings for that surname. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:57 am by Danielle Citron
The Emergence of Global Environmental Law (with Tseming Yang), 36 Ecology Law Quarterly 615 (2009) “Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
White, 14-10376 and White v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm by John Elwood
Currently, six states provide for criminal juries of six or eight jurors: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Utah. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On February 8, 1887, Congress passed the Dawes Act, named for its author, Senator Henry Dawes of Massachusetts. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
White, 14-10376 and White v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:04 am
* * * [R]oughly 56 percent [of subprime loans originated in 2006] went to non-Hispanic whites. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Lessons from the Not-So-Distant Past The closest analogy in the Supreme Court's cases is the unanimous decision in Hurley v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:06 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  This law, which has been applied in various other states, was addressed in a landmark case in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts entitled Diaz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]