Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 381 - 400 of 20,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Nevertheless, [the opponent] is of the opinion that the remaining product claims are still directed to subject-matter excluded from patentability by A 53(b). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is in conformity with decisions T 931/95 [8], T 641/00 [6], T 258/03 [5.3] and T 531/03 [2.5] which stipulate that for the assessment of inventive step account should be taken of only those features which contribute to the technical character of the claimed subject-matter. [5] Thus, for assessing inventive step of the method of claim 1, the first and fundamental question to be answered is whether, also in the light of the description […], the… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:17 pm by The Namby Pamby
If that didn’t work I could just frankly admit that my intentions are pure: “The court is mistaken, I am not flirting, I am merely attempting horizontal bribery” When my efforts to seduce the truth fail, I can just fall back on the things that define a component lawyer, that being knowledge of the law:“The law on this issue is clearly establishes that the Plaintiff is a whiny bitch” No matter what happens, there is one thing that even I… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
True that plaintiffs often look to compilation as fallback; but usually unprotectable not b/c missed one category but b/c it wasn’t original or was functional. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Cathy Moran, Esq.
A contested lien strip on a client’s home is, on it’s face, as black and white a contest as my 707(b)(3) matter:  one dollar of equity for the challenged lien and your client is stuck with the junior mortgage. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Therefore, the [patent proprietor] concluded that for the part of the subject-matter of the claims that did not concern carboxylic acid imides and methyl urea derivatives as components (b) the claim to priority had to be valid.[2.1.4] Claim 1 as granted comprises the following components other than carboxylic acid imides and methyl urea derivatives in group (b): phosphoric acid esters, thiadiazoles, isothiazolinones, imidazoles, guanidines, aromatic carboxylic acids, and… [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Eliana Baer
However, special considerations are contained in Rule 5:1-5(b) for arbitrated custody and parenting time matters. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:15 am
Sierra Vista petitioned to have Doctor declared a vexatious litigator under CCP 391(b)(2) and was denied (i.e. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
” [7] In both cases, the Court held that “because the text of Section 10(b) does not prohibit aiding and abetting … a private plaintiff may not maintain an aiding and abetting suit under 10(b). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:57 am by Liisa Speaker
The trial court upheld the fee.Opinion:While the Michigan Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that local units of government share the costs for juvenile adjudication and supervision, it disagreed with the imposition of the $100 probation supervision fee, vacating and remanding the matter back to the trial court.The court said:Petitioner first contended the $100 probation supervision fee is authorized by MCL 712A.18(1)(b). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:53 am by Docket Navigator
"[Plaintiff] argues that the jury deliberations took only 45 minutes, and '[t]hese cursory 'deliberations' yielded a verdict counter to the great weight of the evidence.' However, '[b]rief jury deliberation is not, in itself, sufficient basis to support a new trial motion. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:50 am
But the Academy’s choice of no one but Stallone to represent 'Creed' at the awards—no [Michael B.] [read post]