Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers" Results 381 - 400 of 21,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
This wide delegation of power naturally creates concerns about fairness. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:15 am by William Morriss
However, current subject matter eligibility jurisprudence provides tools to simply treat content-based inventions as ineligible (e.g., Electric Power Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 2:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2016)Of damages:In its JMOL motion, Fairchild argued that the evidencepresented by Power Integrations was insufficient asa matter of law to invoke the entire market value rule,pointing to our decision in LaserDynamics. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
The first proposition is that the treaty-makers have the constitutional power to make treaties on matters falling outside Congress' enumerated powers. [read post]