Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
In R(Alansi) v Newham LBC, Stuart-Smith J held that, although Ms Alansi had a legitimate expectation that she would remain a priority homeseeker on Newham’s housing register, Newham had not acted unreasonably and in abuse of its power by withdrawing its representation. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Johnson, 3:14-cv-1211-J-34MCR (M.D. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Johnson, 3:14-cv-1211-J-34MCR (M.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Jeanne Fromer: often people say that TMs aren’t as necessary any more b/c of aggregators, but the areas of law may matter much more in a system where there are lots of people trying to game reputation. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Billak, J. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
As the shock waves of the ECJ’s decision in Google Spain v González [2014] EUECJ C-131/12 (13 May 2014) continue to lap up against California’s shorelines, thorny questions continue to arise by the day as to the scope of the decision. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:18 pm
By Carolyn J. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:16 am
Instead, litigants must rely upon the general protections set forth in Rule 26(b)(2)(C). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:13 am
Floyd Douglas J. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:20 pm
" b. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
James J. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
Here, the court simply set the matter for trial.In Robert J. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
Kevin C. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 3:39 am
Rev. 1489John C. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
But it’s not there b/c of property rights. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 9:31 am
" in 7-Eleven Inc., MDK Corp., C & J Realty, LP, and ENSR Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:01 am
Okay, that’s a provocative title. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
"(J) Melanoma. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:27 pm
The panel – over Judge Chester J. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
The panel – over Judge Chester J. [read post]
