Search for: "Materials Co., Ltd." Results 381 - 400 of 1,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd & Anor, Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL and ZTE Corporation & Anor v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL, heard 21- 24 October. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
., ESAB AB, Hyundai Welding Co., Ltd., and Kiswel Ltd. filed a joint response on November 6, 2009 in support of Sidergas’ motion. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:24 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: • T &T Handbag Industrial Co., Ltd., of China; • Sanjiu Leather Co., Ltd. of China; • Meada Corporation (d/b/a Diophy International) of El Monte, California; • Pacpro, Inc., of El Monte, California; • Jianyong Zheng (a/k/a Jiu Gao Zheng, Jiu An Zheng, Jian Yong Zheng, Peter Zheng) of… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:08 am by John L. Welch
Crown Confectionary Co., Ltd., Opposition No. 91171726 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark MYCHEW (Stylized) for "chewing gum; candy; caramels" in view of the registered mark HI-CHEW (Stylized) for candy.]Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am by David
BGI Genomics Co., Ltd., No. 20-cv-01465-WHO, 2021 WL 428632, at *4 (N.D. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 12:54 am
Ltd., is controlled by the Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co., or BNBM, a state-owned entity controlled by the Chinese government. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:09 am by Neil Wilkof
This question was considered recently in the decision in Singapore of Baidu Europe B.V. v Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 8. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
The court today also denied a motion by Ortho Biotech to intervene as a co-plaintiff in the case. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Confidential information GuestKat Alex Woolgar provided a case comment on the judgment in Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v Celgard, LLC [2020] EWCA Civ 1293 recently delivered by the UK Court of Appeal [the first instance decision was addressed by IPKat here]. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
Furthermore, the letters “arissa’s” appear in the same color purple as the two vertical lines in the stylized letter M, reinforcing the consumer perception that Applicant’s stylized M mark "is intricately interwoven with the remaining letters that comprise the word 'Marissa’s.'"While we acknowledge that our primary reviewing court and the Board have allowed owners of a composite mark to register separately one or more of its several elements, see,… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:20 am by Peter Groves
However, the judge was also satisfied that the defendants should be free to co-operate with public authorities investigating the claimants' activities. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:20 am by Peter Groves
However, the judge was also satisfied that the defendants should be free to co-operate with public authorities investigating the claimants' activities. [read post]