Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2015, 8:03 pm
Freiman, 99 A.D.2d 765, 471 N.Y.S.2d 870; Matter of Gloria S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
See, Matter of Elianne M., 196 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dept., 1993). [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 7:15 pm
Bloomfield 30 A.D.3d 151 (1st Dept. 2006). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
A.D. it is clear that the courts are still struggling over jurisdictional issues. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
M.R. v A.D., 35 Misc. 3d 619, 940 N.Y.S.2d 808 (N.Y. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
Matter of Commissioner of Social Services (Jones) v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:16 pm
Vill. of Pittsford, 137 A.D.3d 1566, 1566 (N.Y. 4th Dept. 2016).Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Ethics [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 10:40 am
They date to the time of the Bar Kokhba revolt (A.D. 132 to 135), when the Jewish people rose up against the Roman Empire. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
The matter is affirmed on appeal with costs. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:44 am
Saratoga County, 251 A.D.2d 866]. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 3:07 pm
Assn., 262 A.D.2d 452, 454). [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
May, 228 A.D.2d 523 [2nd Dept. 1996]; People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:41 am
Gee, 54 A.D.3d 613, 864 N.Y.S.2d 9 (1st Dept 2008). [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:19 pm
” Furthermore, the Court found there was no feasible alternative to the underpinning, and that in cases such as Madison 96 Associated LLC v. 17 East 96th Owners Corp, 121 A.D.3d 605, 608, 995 N.Y.S.2d 553 (1st Dep’t 2014) and Matter of Tory Burch LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
” According to the A.D., the omitted “Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Yi Jing Tan, 155 A.D.3d 1023, 1024, 64 N.Y.S.3d 556; Cantalupo Constr. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
Parsad, 243 A.D.2d 510, 662 N.Y.S.2d 835 (2nd Dept.1997). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 am
Mann, 283 A.D.2d 292, 293, 727 N.Y.S.2d 58 (1st Dep't 2001). [read post]
5 May 2016, 4:00 am
"*Notwithstanding this procedural issue, the Appellate Division retained the matter and consider Stanek’s petition “in the interest of judicial economy. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:48 pm
A.D. [read post]