Search for: "Matter of Lilly" Results 381 - 400 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 9:58 am by Bill Heinze
Benson’s contribution therefore does not make him a co-inventor of the subject matter of claim 11. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
During discovery, Axa demanded that the lawyers handling the insurance coverage matter for Baxter turn over its memos and e-mails that it delivered to it. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly wrote in an email that antidepressants work. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 11:42 pm
 (“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 7:53 am
It would certainly be interesting to know who that "high-ranking public official" who helped Scruggs in the tax-prosecution matter was, if there was one. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:34 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, 65 NY2d 449, 492 NYS2d 584 (1985), "If the issue has not been litigated, there is no identity of issues between the present action and the prior determination. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 7:52 pm
So many employers and companies do the right thing as a matter of course, but passing this bill says that this is now a matter of right and wrong, that discrimination is unacceptable anywhere and we are all diminished when we fall short. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
 In this post, I’ll first elaborate on what I understand the concern to be, and then explain why I believe that the consequence that Justice Breyer hypothesizes, while certainly a valid matter to consider, does not in fact arise and need not constrain development of Confrontation Clause doctrine.I think what Justice Breyer is responding to is basically this:  Over 200 years, a complex web of hearsay law has been worked out, reflecting judgments of what hearsay should be… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 6:13 am
In re KGK Synergize (non precedential) (Patently-O) US: Myriad sticks to its business model despite legal action brought by PUBPAT and others: Association for Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Amazing race: Win $250,000 for commercialising biomedical research (Patent Baristas) US: BIO survey on technology transfer shows complexity of university-industry relationships (PatentBIOtech)   Products Adderall (Dextroamphetamine, Amphetamine) – US: Shire announces settlement… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 5:13 am
In re KGK Synergize (non precedential) (Patently-O) US: Myriad sticks to its business model despite legal action brought by PUBPAT and others: Association for Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Amazing race: Win $250,000 for commercialising biomedical research (Patent Baristas) US: BIO survey on technology transfer shows complexity of university-industry relationships (PatentBIOtech) Products Adderall (Dextroamphetamine, Amphetamine) - US: Shire announces settlement with Sandoz over… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 5:13 am
In re KGK Synergize (non precedential) (Patently-O) US: Myriad sticks to its business model despite legal action brought by PUBPAT and others: Association for Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Amazing race: Win $250,000 for commercialising biomedical research (Patent Baristas) US: BIO survey on technology transfer shows complexity of university-industry relationships (PatentBIOtech) Products Adderall (Dextroamphetamine, Amphetamine) - US: Shire announces settlement with Sandoz over… [read post]